About
Daniel StoneX ninja
Melbourne, AU
Links
my websitemy photos at flickr
x.org
eat.fi
Categories
/ (86)tech/ (84)
collabora/ (1)
fdo/ (9)
lca/ (1)
ubuntu/ (6)
x/ (41)
xds/ (3)
travel/ (2)
Archives
2010-Mar2010-Feb
2009-Dec
2009-Oct
2009-Sep
2009-Aug
2009-Jul
2009-Apr
2009-Mar
2008-Aug
2008-Jul
2008-Jun
2008-May
2008-Feb
2007-Oct
2007-Sep
2007-Jul
2007-Jun
2007-May
2007-Mar
2007-Jan
2006-Nov
2006-Aug
2006-May
2006-Apr
2006-Mar
2006-Feb
2006-Jan
2005-Dec
2005-Nov
2005-Oct
2005-Sep
2005-Aug
2005-Jul
2005-Jun
2005-Apr
2005-Mar
2005-Feb
2005-Jan
2004-Dec
2004-Nov
2004-Oct
2004-Sep
2004-Jun
2004-May
2004-Mar
Calendar
| < | March 2005 | > | ||||
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Tue, 15 Mar 2005
Wouter asserts that Ubuntu has
more than 30 full-time employees. I know it wasn't his number (Scott came
up with it and should've been a bit more clear), but it's badly wrong, anyway.
Canonical has more than 30 employees, but Ubuntu ... the full-time distribution
team hardly breaks double figures. That's pretty comparable to the number of
people working on the m68k port (albeit the latter are not funded full-time).
But it's an interesting point nonetheless, and thanks to the assumption that
Canonical does nothing other than Ubuntu, people seem to assume that Ubuntu was
produced by a team of 30, 40, whatever; not even close. That team was barely
ten.
[23:04 | /tech/ubuntu |
# | the tv in the background | home ]